How did Chinese cars (especially electric ones) strengthen their presence in Europe?
The expansion of Chinese cars in Europe, especially electric vehicles, has been developing for years, although it has recently become much more visible due to increasing international sales and competitive pricing. The rise of electric vehicles created a technological opportunity that Chinese firms could effectively exploit thanks to strong state support and early investments in battery technology. One of the key advantages of Chinese automakers lies in battery production and supply chains. Companies such as BYD have integrated battery manufacturing into their own operations, giving them greater control over costs, technology, and raw materials. Government subsidies have also played a role in accelerating development, although similar market interventions (albeit less substantial) can also be observed in other countries. As Chinese companies expanded internationally, trade tensions emerged, particularly in the United States and the European Union, where tariffs were introduced to slow their market penetration. In response, Chinese manufacturers have begun establishing production facilities in Europe, which could reduce the impact of such trade barriers. From a sustainability perspective, ESG scores suggest that Chinese automakers currently lag behind European, Asian, and North American manufacturers. However, the gap has been narrowing rapidly, as large companies can improve their sustainability performance relatively quickly. If Chinese manufacturers continue to improve their ESG performance while maintaining their economic advantages, the global expansion of Chinese electric vehicles may become primarily an economic rather than a sustainability issue.
New players: Chinese cars enter Europe’s market
More and more Chinese cars can be seen on the roads as their distribution across Europe has expanded, typically winning over customers with lower prices. Although the news often reports the rapid and overwhelming success of Chinese electric cars (for example, the Chinese company BYD has surpassed the American Tesla in electric vehicle sales, which until recently had been considered the benchmark of electric car manufacturing), the Chinese automotive boom visible today has actually been taking shape for years.
When did it begin?
In the early 1990s, many car manufacturers outsourced part of their production activities to China. Among several factors, this was mainly driven by cost reduction. China primarily attracted foreign investment with its cheaper labor force; however, it did not want to completely lose control over these investments. As a result, foreign companies were required to operate through joint ventures. This regulation was introduced in 1979, even before the major wave of automotive outsourcing (New York Times, 1983). The regulation was later supplemented and modified several times in line with national economic interests, but the joint venture requirement was never abandoned. One of the largest examples of such a joint venture is SAIC Motor Corp (formerly Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation), which, in addition to its own brands, has produced Volkswagen vehicles since 1984 and General Motors vehicles since 1998. Thus, for several decades China has been attracting the technology and capital of foreign companies and, put bluntly, has learned how to manufacture cars. Before the 2008 global financial crisis, the automotive industry, which is highly sensitive to business cycles, performed quite well, and Chinese car brands also sought to expand (Automotive News Europe, 2006).
Just before the crisis, in 2006, there was a stronger attempt to enter the European market, but these efforts encountered significant obstacles, and the major expansion into Europe did not materialize. Among the main issues was poor performance in crash tests (Automotive News Europe, 2006). It became clear to Chinese manufacturers that they were not yet capable of competing effectively (MIT Technology Review, 2023).
However, after the crisis, a technology emerged that almost completely reshaped the automotive industry: electric vehicles. As early as the 2000s, China provided significant state support for the development of electric vehicles (MIT Technology Review, 2023), which today means that Chinese manufacturers account for roughly half of global electric vehicle sales.
The economic dimensions of the expansion of Chinese (electric) cars
Why are Chinese car manufacturers able to advance so quickly?
Despite the ongoing debates surrounding electric vehicles (such as whether they are truly more sustainable and whether they can be produced profitably) most car manufacturers still consider increasing the production of electric vehicles an important goal. Competition in this field is heavily influenced by battery technology. A longer driving range is particularly valuable because charging infrastructure is still insufficient or overloaded in many places, making range an important factor for consumers. From the perspective of a car manufacturer, two key elements are required to increase driving range. First, access to the raw materials needed for batteries (or to fully manufactured batteries) is essential. Second, companies must be capable of developing battery technologies with higher energy density (MIT Technology Review, 2023).
Battery production integrated into the supply chain – and often into the company itself
However, the raw materials required for batteries are limited, and the supply chain is highly concentrated. Automakers are therefore seeking partnerships that enable them to develop new electric models. Companies that have achieved surprising success in the automotive industry with fully electric vehicles (such as Tesla and the Chinese company BYD) have integrated battery manufacturing into their own supply chains. Going even further, BYD manufactures its batteries entirely in-house (Reuters, 2023). This provides such a significant competitive advantage in the current environment that it can be said, without exaggeration, that their rapid progress is largely due to this factor. The key question, therefore, is whether battery manufacturing capabilities exist within the company or within its supply chain. Among other benefits, this also allows manufacturers to produce electric vehicles at lower costs. Many Chinese manufacturers possess this capability and also have relatively easy access to the necessary raw materials (carsguide.com, 2023).
State subsidies supporting faster development
It should also not be forgotten that Chinese manufacturers benefit from state support. From the early days of electric mobility, the Chinese government provided substantial subsidies, totaling approximately 173 billion USD between 2009 and 2022 (reason.com, 2024). To nuance the picture, it should be noted that the reliability of Chinese data is sometimes difficult to verify, meaning the actual amount of support may be even higher. These subsidies have triggered significant criticism, particularly in the North American market (wrp.org, 2024). However, such subsidies are far less relevant for the large companies that have already expanded internationally. For example, BYD recently reported revenues of nearly 120 billion USD in a single year, while also remaining profitable. The criticism is justified in the sense that government intervention in markets is generally not beneficial in the long term. However, similar examples can be found elsewhere. For instance, during General Motors’ accelerator pedal scandal in 2014, the U.S. government intervened to prevent the company from going bankrupt (Reuters, 2014). Likewise, in response to Chinese subsidies, Ford received 9.2 billion USD in support in 2023 to help catch up in electric vehicle manufacturing (Bloomberg, 2023). China undoubtedly plays an active role in shaping the market, but comparable, though sometimes less extensive, interventions can also be observed elsewhere. Moreover, in order to strengthen domestic electric vehicle industries, it is likely that more examples similar to the support provided to Ford will appear in the future, not only in the United States but possibly in Europe as well.
Expansion plans slowed by tariffs
The largest automotive markets in the world are China, the United States, and the European Union. In 2024, nearly 31.5 million passenger vehicles were sold in China, representing almost 33% of global passenger car sales. In comparison, approximately 16 million vehicles were sold in the United States and 12.5 million in the European Union (OICA, 2025). For Chinese manufacturers, the domestic market is already well established. Therefore, expansion into the United States and the European Union was a logical step given the size of these markets. Learning from earlier failures, product quality is no longer an issue from a regulatory perspective; Chinese vehicles meet the requirements necessary to be sold on both continents. Put simply: China has learned how to manufacture cars. However, Chinese electric vehicles have generated strong opposition in the United States. Tariffs imposed on them have been increased to four times their previous levels (bbc.com, 2024; euronews, 2024). Similarly, although less drastically, the European Union has also introduced tariffs. A further question has emerged regarding vehicles manufactured in China but belonging to European brands: should they be treated as Chinese cars (since they are produced and imported from China) or as domestic vehicles (since the brand’s headquarters are located within the EU)? In practice, tariffs treat them as Chinese vehicles (euronews, 2024). As a result, this policy has further increased the already high price of electric vehicles on the European market. The largest European manufacturers opposed the introduction of these tariffs and did not consider them necessary to protect the European market (Reuters, 2024). Looking at sales statistics, this position is not surprising. For German automakers in particular, the Chinese market is extremely important, and they fear that China could respond with retaliatory tariffs. Moreover, there are concerns related to battery supply chains, as manufacturers are reluctant to purchase batteries (most of which originate from China) at even higher prices. In response to political uncertainty and tariffs, Chinese manufacturers have already begun adapting their strategies. On December 22, 2023, the Chinese company BYD announced that it would build a factory in Szeged, Hungary (byd.com, 2023). This development will make it much more difficult to slow Chinese expansion through tariffs, as vehicles produced within the EU cannot easily be subjected to punitive import duties.
The sustainability dimensions of the expansion of Chinese (electric) cars
How do we measure sustainability?
In addition to economic issues, the sustainability aspects of the expansion of Chinese electric vehicles are at least equally important. To make this rather broad topic more tangible, ESG scores were used as a basis for the analysis (Refinitiv EIKON, 2026). ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance. These three main components are referred to as pillars and represent the key areas in which companies are required to report their activities. Although ESG scores provide a comprehensive corporate indicator that captures the sustainability dimension relatively well, they are largely based on self-reporting and should therefore be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, they represent an important step toward systematically monitoring sustainability.
In order to obtain a quantitative picture of sustainability, the 40 largest automotive manufacturers by most recent annual revenue were examined. Among them, 27 were Asian companies (including 14 Chinese firms), 9 were European, and 4 were American.
Chinese automakers currently lag behind in sustainability
Based on ESG scores, European Union automotive manufacturers appear to be the most sustainable, with the seven companies achieving an average score of 82.9 out of 100 (Figure 1). Asian automakers (excluding China) are, on average, more sustainable than American manufacturers. Among U.S. automakers, General Motors achieved the highest ESG score, 71.57, while among Asian manufacturers the Indian company Mahindra reached the highest value, 92.45 (highest score within the sample of 40 companies).
Figure 1: Average ESG scores of the world’s 40 largest automotive manufacturers by region, 2016–2025
Source: Own calculations and editing based on Refinitiv EIKON
However, when focusing specifically on Chinese manufacturers, a significantly lower average ESG score can be observed, at 60.9. Although the gap is closing quickly, large manufacturers can improve rapidly. The previously mentioned BYD has an ESG score of 75.27, whereas for many years it was only around 50 (Refinitiv EIKON, 2026). In addition, recent developments (e.g., the U.S. withdrawal from certain environmental initiatives (bbc.com, 2026)) appear to be reflected in the recent downturn of ESG scores.
Based on these ESG scores, it can be concluded that the sustainability performance of Chinese automakers currently lags significantly behind that of automotive manufacturers operating in other parts of the world. Moreover, since this analysis includes only the 40 largest companies, smaller automotive firms are likely, on average, performing even worse.
From a sustainability perspective, the growing presence of Chinese cars, and Chinese electric vehicles in particular, cannot yet be considered uniformly positive. If the environmental and social impacts of production are harmful, then increasing sales volumes may amplify these negative effects overall.
Predicting the future with certainty is difficult. However, considering that European manufacturers themselves have only begun to make their operations more sustainable under substantial regulatory and societal pressure, it is possible that Chinese manufacturers will face similar pressures in the future, either from their domestic environment or from the markets into which they expand.
If this occurs, improvements in their sustainability performance can be expected. Should that happen, the production and spread of Chinese cars (and Chinese electric vehicles in particular) would become primarily an economic question rather than a sustainability one.
Sources
- Automotive News Europe (2006). Chinese automakers hit a wall in Europe. link: https://europe.autonews.com/article/20060417/ANE/60414094/chinese-automakers-hit-a-wall-in-europe
- com (2024). Biden hits Chinese electric cars and solar cells with higher tariffs. link: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-69004520
- com (2026). Trump withdraws US from key climate treaty and dozens of other groups. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp80ln97py5o
- Bloomberg (2023). Ford Gets $9.2 Billion to Help US Catch Up With China’s EV Dominance. link: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-ford-ev-battery-plant-funding-biden-green-technology/
- com (2023). BYD to Build A New Energy Passenger Vehicle Factory in Hungary for Localised Production in Europe. link: https://www.byd.com/eu/news-list/BYD_to_Build_A_New_Energy_Passenger_Vehicle_Factory_in_Hungary_for_Localised_Production_in_Europe.html
- com (2023). Here’s why Chinese brands like BYD and MG can price their electric cars so cheap. link: https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-news/heres-why-chinese-brands-like-byd-and-mg-can-price-their-electric-cars-so-cheap-91451
- Euronews (2024). European tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles: All you need to know. https://www.euronews.com/business/2024/10/30/european-tariffs-on-chinese-electric-vehicles-all-you-need-to-know
- MIT Technology Review (2023). How did China come to dominate the world of electric cars? link: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/21/1068880/how-did-china-dominate-electric-cars-policy/
- New York Times (1983). China Acts on Joint Ventures. link: https://www.nytimes.com/1983/09/27/business/china-acts-on-joint-ventures.html
- OICA (2025). Global sales statistics. link: https://www.oica.net/category/sales-statistics/
- com (2024). China is doubling down on electric vehicle subsidies. link: https://reason.com/2024/04/29/china-is-doubling-down-on-electric-vehicle-subsidies/
- Refinitiv EIKON (2026). Refinitiv EIKON database. link: https://eikon.refinitiv.com/index.html.
- Reuters (2014). U.S. government says it lost $11.2 billion on GM bailout. link: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA3T0MU/
- Reuters (2023). Comment: Why China’s car makers are streets ahead in race to develop electric vehicles. link: https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/comment-why-chinas-car-makers-are-streets-ahead-race-develop-electric-vehicles-2023-01-23/
- Reuters (2024). EU tariffs on Chinese EVs could backfire, German car bosses warn. link: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-tariffs-chinese-evs-could-backfire-hobble-green-deal-bmw-ceo-says-2024-05-08/